Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Bitwise Bitwise is a leading crypto asset manager offering index funds, single-asset ETFs, and institutional products. It serves investors who want regulated, packaged exposure to digital assets rather than h... Figment Figment is one of the world's largest blockchain infrastructure companies, providing institutional-grade staking services across 40+ protocols including Solana. Their Solana staking offering includes...
Figment is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Bitwise (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Bitwise uses a paid model, while Figment is paid.
Bitwise offers 5 features including Index funds spanning multiple crypto assets, Single-asset ETFs including an approved Solana ETF, SOL included in diversified crypto indexes, and 2 more. Figment counters with 5 features including Institutional Solana staking with enterprise SLAs, Staking API for programmatic management, White-label staking solutions, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Bitwise currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Figment is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Bitwise's key strengths include regulated, packaged exposure to sol without self-custody, institutional-grade custody and research backing, diversified index options beyond single assets. Figment stands out for top-tier institutional reputation, billions in staked assets, comprehensive apis for integration. On the flip side, Bitwise's weaknesses include custodial products — investors don't hold underlying sol, while Figment's main drawback is premium institutional pricing.
More comparisons
Compare Bitwise with…
Compare Figment with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | — | 27,272 |
| Categories | Staking | Staking |
| Description | Crypto index funds and Solana ETF for institutional investors | Institutional-grade staking infrastructure for Solana with APIs and white-label solutions |
Both Bitwise and Figment operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Figment has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Bitwise's pricing and check Figment's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.