Head-to-head · RPC Providers
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 30, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
bloXroute bloXroute Labs operates a blockchain distribution network (BDN) designed to accelerate transaction propagation for Solana traders and validators. By optimizing how transactions travel across the netwo... Ligma Node Ligma Node provides private, high-performance Solana RPC nodes aimed at traders and automation that need low-latency network access. It markets dedicated bare-metal infrastructure rather than shared p...
bloXroute is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Ligma Node (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
bloXroute uses a freemium model, while Ligma Node is paid.
bloXroute offers 5 features including Blockchain distribution network for fast transaction propagation, MEV protection against front-running and sandwiching, Private transaction pools for routing, and 2 more. Ligma Node counters with 5 features including Dedicated bare-metal Solana RPC nodes, Multi-region (USA, EU, Asia) deployment, Geyser streaming support, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. bloXroute currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Ligma Node is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
bloXroute's key strengths include speeds up transaction delivery for latency-sensitive trading, mev protection reduces front-running risk, private pools offer more discreet transaction routing. Ligma Node stands out for dedicated infrastructure, not shared endpoints, regional selection for lower latency, unlimited bandwidth and requests. On the flip side, bloXroute's weaknesses include specialized infrastructure not needed by casual users, while Ligma Node's main drawback is advertised tps figures are vendor estimates.
More comparisons
Compare bloXroute with…
Compare Ligma Node with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 23,006 | 4,849 |
| Categories | Developer Tools, RPC Providers | RPC Providers |
| Description | High-performance transaction distribution network with MEV protection for Solana | High-performance Solana RPC nodes with up to 6,500 TPS on dedicated bare-metal servers |
Both bloXroute and Ligma Node operate in the rpc providers space, so this is a direct head-to-head. bloXroute has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — bloXroute is free to start and check Ligma Node's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.