Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (2) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 1 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Bubblemaps Bubblemaps is an onchain intelligence platform that visualizes token holder distributions through interactive bubble charts. Each bubble represents a wallet, sized by holdings, with lines connecting w... DeFade DeFade is a free Solana memecoin scanner that analyzes any token for rug-pull risk and surfaces on-chain intelligence such as whale activity and insider networks. Users can scan a token in seconds wit...
Both Bubblemaps and DeFade hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Bubblemaps uses a freemium model, while DeFade is free. DeFade has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Bubblemaps's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Bubblemaps offers 8 features including Interactive bubble charts showing token holder distribution, Wallet connection mapping — see which holders are linked, Insider cluster detection for spotting coordinated wallets, and 5 more. DeFade counters with 5 features including Free rug-pull risk scoring, Whale and insider-network tracking, Bundle and sniper detection, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Bubblemaps currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. DeFade is rated healthy with 94.6% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Bubblemaps's key strengths include best visual representation of token holder data available, immediately reveals insider clusters and concentration, free tier is useful for basic research. DeFade stands out for completely free with no sign-up, rich on-chain analysis across many modules, browser and mobile coverage. On the flip side, Bubblemaps's weaknesses include premium plan needed for historical data and advanced features, while DeFade's main drawback is risk scores are probabilistic, not guarantees.
More comparisons
Compare Bubblemaps with…
Compare DeFade with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 282,489 | 1,483 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Meme Tools, Security & Audit |
| Description | Visual token holder analysis with bubble charts to detect scams | Free Solana token scanner with rug pull detection and whale tracking |
Both Bubblemaps and DeFade operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Bubblemaps is free to start and DeFade is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.