Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (2) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 1 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Bubblemaps Bubblemaps is an onchain intelligence platform that visualizes token holder distributions through interactive bubble charts. Each bubble represents a wallet, sized by holdings, with lines connecting w... Fystack Fystack delivers enterprise-grade MPC (multi-party computation) wallet infrastructure built for fintechs, payment platforms, and crypto businesses operating on Solana and 10+ other blockchains. Rather...
Both Bubblemaps and Fystack hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Bubblemaps uses a freemium model, while Fystack is paid.
Bubblemaps offers 8 features including Interactive bubble charts showing token holder distribution, Wallet connection mapping — see which holders are linked, Insider cluster detection for spotting coordinated wallets, and 5 more. Fystack counters with 5 features including MPC threshold-signature security with no single point of failure, Self-hosted or managed SaaS deployment options, API-first architecture for embedding custody into apps, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Bubblemaps currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Fystack is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Bubblemaps's key strengths include best visual representation of token holder data available, immediately reveals insider clusters and concentration, free tier is useful for basic research. Fystack stands out for removes single-key risk through multi-party computation, flexible deployment to match compliance and control needs, supports solana plus 10+ blockchains from one platform. On the flip side, Bubblemaps's weaknesses include premium plan needed for historical data and advanced features, while Fystack's main drawback is aimed at businesses and developers, not retail users.
More comparisons
Compare Bubblemaps with…
Compare Fystack with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 282,489 | 263 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit, Wallets, Payment Tools |
| Description | Visual token holder analysis with bubble charts to detect scams | Enterprise-grade MPC wallet infrastructure for Solana and multi-chain |
Both Bubblemaps and Fystack operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Bubblemaps is free to start and check Fystack's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.