Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 15, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (2) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 1 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Bubblemaps Bubblemaps is an onchain intelligence platform that visualizes token holder distributions through interactive bubble charts. Each bubble represents a wallet, sized by holdings, with lines connecting w... Immunefi Immunefi is Web3's leading bug-bounty and security-services platform, protecting over $190 billion in user funds across the industry. It connects protocols with the whitehat researcher community. Sec...
Both Bubblemaps and Immunefi hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Bubblemaps uses a freemium model, while Immunefi is freemium. Both offer free tiers with paid upgrades, so try each before committing to a paid plan.
Bubblemaps offers 8 features including Interactive bubble charts showing token holder distribution, Wallet connection mapping — see which holders are linked, Insider cluster detection for spotting coordinated wallets, and 5 more. Immunefi counters with 5 features including Leading Web3 bug-bounty platform, Protects $190B+ in user funds, Rewards for disclosing vulnerabilities in Solana programs, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Bubblemaps currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Immunefi is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Bubblemaps's key strengths include best visual representation of token holder data available, immediately reveals insider clusters and concentration, free tier is useful for basic research. Immunefi stands out for continuous security beyond one-time audits, aligns incentives with whitehat researchers, industry-leading scale and payouts. On the flip side, Bubblemaps's weaknesses include premium plan needed for historical data and advanced features, while Immunefi's main drawback is for protocol teams and researchers, not end users.
More comparisons
Compare Bubblemaps with…
Compare Immunefi with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 285,792 | 75,564 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Visual token holder analysis with bubble charts to detect scams | Web3's leading bug bounty platform protecting $190B+ in funds |
Both Bubblemaps and Immunefi operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Bubblemaps is free to start and Immunefi is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.