Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 15, 2026
 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 4 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Bubblemaps Bubblemaps is an onchain intelligence platform that visualizes token holder distributions through interactive bubble charts. Each bubble represents a wallet, sized by holdings, with lines connecting w... Neodyme Neodyme is a specialized security research firm with deep Solana expertise, working with the Solana Foundation since 2020 on core protocol security reviews. Their team has discovered and responsibly d...
Bubblemaps is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Neodyme (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Bubblemaps uses a freemium model, while Neodyme is paid.
Bubblemaps offers 8 features including Interactive bubble charts showing token holder distribution, Wallet connection mapping — see which holders are linked, Insider cluster detection for spotting coordinated wallets, and 5 more. Neodyme counters with 4 features including Deep-dive Solana smart contract audits since 2020, Vulnerability research across Solana runtime and programs, Open-source Solana Security Workshop, and 1 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Bubblemaps currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Neodyme is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Bubblemaps's key strengths include best visual representation of token holder data available, immediately reveals insider clusters and concentration, free tier is useful for basic research. Neodyme stands out for one of the earliest solana security teams with unmatched depth, track record preventing ~$1b in potential theft. On the flip side, Bubblemaps's weaknesses include premium plan needed for historical data and advanced features, while Neodyme's main drawback is small boutique team with limited availability.
More comparisons
Compare Bubblemaps with…
Compare Neodyme with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 285,792 | 5,614 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Visual token holder analysis with bubble charts to detect scams | Elite Solana security research and smart contract auditing since 2020 |
Both Bubblemaps and Neodyme operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Bubblemaps has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Bubblemaps is free to start and check Neodyme's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.