Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 15, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 1 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Bubblemaps Bubblemaps is an onchain intelligence platform that visualizes token holder distributions through interactive bubble charts. Each bubble represents a wallet, sized by holdings, with lines connecting w... Range Range is a real-time security platform for blockchains, bridges, and rollups that inspects every transaction to detect exploits, fraud, and compliance risks. It is built for protocol teams and bridge...
Both Bubblemaps and Range hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Bubblemaps uses a freemium model, while Range is paid.
Bubblemaps offers 8 features including Interactive bubble charts showing token holder distribution, Wallet connection mapping — see which holders are linked, Insider cluster detection for spotting coordinated wallets, and 5 more. Range counters with 5 features including Real-time inspection of every transaction for exploits and fraud, Live threat intelligence for Solana protocols and bridges, Forensic explorers for tracing and investigating transactions, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Bubblemaps currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Range is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Bubblemaps's key strengths include best visual representation of token holder data available, immediately reveals insider clusters and concentration, free tier is useful for basic research. Range stands out for promoted by the solana foundation in its 2026 defi security overhaul, real-time detection rather than after-the-fact analysis, cross-chain coverage suits bridge operators. On the flip side, Bubblemaps's weaknesses include premium plan needed for historical data and advanced features, while Range's main drawback is aimed at protocols and operators, not end users.
More comparisons
Compare Bubblemaps with…
Compare Range with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 285,792 | 60 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Visual token holder analysis with bubble charts to detect scams | Real-time security and transaction monitoring for Solana and cross-chain protocols |
Both Bubblemaps and Range operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Bubblemaps is free to start and check Range's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.