Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 17, 2026
 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 4 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Bubblemaps Bubblemaps is an onchain intelligence platform that visualizes token holder distributions through interactive bubble charts. Each bubble represents a wallet, sized by holdings, with lines connecting w... Three Sigma Three Sigma is a Web3 security firm specializing in smart contract audits, economic risk modeling, and exploit prevention across multiple ecosystems including Solana. With 150+ audits completed protec...
Bubblemaps is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Three Sigma (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Bubblemaps uses a freemium model, while Three Sigma is paid.
Bubblemaps offers 8 features including Interactive bubble charts showing token holder distribution, Wallet connection mapping — see which holders are linked, Insider cluster detection for spotting coordinated wallets, and 5 more. Three Sigma counters with 4 features including Comprehensive Rust and Solana smart contract audits, Economic risk modeling for DeFi protocols, Threat modeling for CPI injection and signer vulnerabilities, and 1 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Bubblemaps currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Three Sigma is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Bubblemaps's key strengths include best visual representation of token holder data available, immediately reveals insider clusters and concentration, free tier is useful for basic research. Three Sigma stands out for extensive audit track record with $10b+ protected, multi-chain rust expertise across solana, near, and polkadot. On the flip side, Bubblemaps's weaknesses include premium plan needed for historical data and advanced features, while Three Sigma's main drawback is not exclusively solana-focused.
More comparisons
Compare Bubblemaps with…
Compare Three Sigma with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 285,792 | 12,986 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Visual token holder analysis with bubble charts to detect scams | Web3 security audits and economic risk modeling for Solana and beyond |
Both Bubblemaps and Three Sigma operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Bubblemaps has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Bubblemaps is free to start and check Three Sigma's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.