Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Chorus One Chorus One is a leading institutional staking provider that operates validators on Solana and 60+ proof-of-stake networks. It focuses on the operational reliability and security that institutions requ... Figment Figment is one of the world's largest blockchain infrastructure companies, providing institutional-grade staking services across 40+ protocols including Solana. Their Solana staking offering includes...
Figment is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Chorus One (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Chorus One uses a paid model, while Figment is paid.
Chorus One offers 5 features including Validators on Solana and 60+ proof-of-stake networks, $3.5B+ in staked assets under management, 99.9%+ uptime SLA, and 2 more. Figment counters with 5 features including Institutional Solana staking with enterprise SLAs, Staking API for programmatic management, White-label staking solutions, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Chorus One currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Figment is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Chorus One's key strengths include enterprise-grade reliability with a 99.9%+ uptime sla, proven scale managing $3.5b+ in staked assets, single partner for multi-chain staking across 60+ networks. Figment stands out for top-tier institutional reputation, billions in staked assets, comprehensive apis for integration. On the flip side, Chorus One's weaknesses include delegating concentrates stake with a single operator, while Figment's main drawback is premium institutional pricing.
More comparisons
Compare Chorus One with…
Compare Figment with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 18,542 | 27,188 |
| Categories | Staking | Staking |
| Description | Institutional-grade Solana staking and validator infrastructure | Institutional-grade staking infrastructure for Solana with APIs and white-label solutions |
Both Chorus One and Figment operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Figment has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Chorus One's pricing and check Figment's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.