Head-to-head · DeFi & Yield
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (3) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our link, at no extra cost to you.
Pros & cons
Analysis
Citrus Citrus is a peer-to-peer NFT lending protocol on Solana, built by the team behind the Famous Fox Federation. It lets NFT holders unlock liquidity from assets they don't want to sell: borrow SOL agains... Jupiter Lend Jupiter Lend is Jupiter's lending and borrowing platform, which surpassed $500M TVL within 24 hours of its launch in August 2025. It is built around isolated lending vaults with rehypothecation, high...
Jupiter Lend is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.7/5 stars across 3 reviews, compared to 4.5/5 for Citrus (2 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Citrus uses a free model, while Jupiter Lend is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Citrus offers 5 features including Peer-to-peer NFT lending — borrow SOL against NFT collateral, Lend SOL against NFTs to earn yield, Buy-now-pay-later for NFT purchases, and 2 more. Jupiter Lend counters with 5 features including Isolated lending vaults that compartmentalize risk, Rehypothecation for capital efficiency, High loan-to-value borrowing ratios, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Citrus currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Jupiter Lend is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Citrus's key strengths include unlocks liquidity from nfts without selling them, no platform fees and gasless transactions, built by the established famous fox federation team. Jupiter Lend stands out for reached $1.65 billion tvl by october 2025, high ltv ratios improve borrowing capital efficiency, isolated vaults limit cross-market risk contagion.
More comparisons
Compare Citrus with…
Compare Jupiter Lend with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 409 | 617,375 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield, NFT Tools | DeFi & Yield |
| Description | Peer-to-peer NFT lending platform — borrow against or lend against Solana NFTs | Solana's fastest-growing lending market with isolated vaults and high LTV ratios |
Both Citrus and Jupiter Lend operate in the defi & yield space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Jupiter Lend has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Citrus is free to start and Jupiter Lend is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.