Head-to-head · Data & Indexing
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 31, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (3) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Conyr Conyr is a real-time wallet-intelligence platform for Solana that flags insiders, bundlers, and coordinated wallet crews in the same slot their trades land on-chain. It is aimed at traders who want to... Hyperstack Hyperstack by HyperTek is data-infrastructure-as-code for Solana: developers define a single schema relating their on-chain accounts, and the platform auto-provisions everything around it. From that o...
Hyperstack is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 3 reviews, compared to 4.0/5 for Conyr (2 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Conyr uses a freemium model, while Hyperstack is freemium. Both offer free tiers with paid upgrades, so try each before committing to a paid plan.
Conyr offers 5 features including Real-time flagging of insiders, bundlers, and wallet crews, Same-slot detection as trades land on-chain, Own validator for sub-slot latency, and 2 more. Hyperstack counters with 5 features including Single schema definition relating on-chain accounts, Auto-provisioned RPC management and account transforms, Websocket streaming generated from the schema, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Conyr currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Hyperstack is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Conyr's key strengths include same-slot speed gives a timely read on wallet behavior, own validator enables sub-slot latency, helps distinguish organic from coordinated buying. Hyperstack stands out for schema-first workflow collapses backend and frontend data plumbing, generated react hooks speed the path from data to live ui, keeps on-chain backend and frontend in sync without glue code.
More comparisons
Compare Conyr with…
Compare Hyperstack with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | 1,361 | 15,475 |
| Categories | Data & Indexing, Analytics & Charts | Developer Tools, Data & Indexing |
| Description | Real-time Solana wallet intelligence — insiders, bundlers, crews, same-slot | Data-infrastructure-as-code for Solana — schema in, RPC + streaming + React hooks out |
Both Conyr and Hyperstack operate in the data & indexing space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Hyperstack has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Conyr is free to start and Hyperstack is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.