Conyr vs Supanode

Overview

Conyr Conyr is a real-time wallet-intelligence platform for Solana that flags insiders, bundlers, and coordinated wallet crews in the same slot their trades land on-chain. It is aimed at traders who want to... Supanode Supanode is a Solana infrastructure provider built around a low-latency Frankfurt edge, packaging RPC, real-time streaming, transaction landing, and historical data into one stack instead of forcing t...

Community Ratings

Supanode is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.0/5 for Conyr (2 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.

Pricing & Value

Conyr uses a freemium model, while Supanode is paid.

Key Features

Conyr offers 5 features including Real-time flagging of insiders, bundlers, and wallet crews, Same-slot detection as trades land on-chain, Own validator for sub-slot latency, and 2 more. Supanode counters with 7 features including Yellowstone gRPC streaming (accounts, transactions, slots, blocks) at ~3.8ms p99 from Frankfurt with server-side filtering, ShredStream: raw block shreds over UDP at ~0.4ms p99 delivery, TPU Sender: stake-weighted transaction submission direct to slot leaders, bypassing the public mempool under congestion, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.

Reliability & Health

We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Conyr currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Supanode is rated healthy with 90.6% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.

Strengths

Conyr's key strengths include same-slot speed gives a timely read on wallet behavior, own validator enables sub-slot latency, helps distinguish organic from coordinated buying. Supanode stands out for frankfurt-based low-latency edge (sub-4ms grpc, sub-1ms shred delivery) suits latency-sensitive trading and mev workloads, stake-weighted tpu landing is independently benchmarked #1 of 18 submission services for getting transactions into blocks, integrated stack (rpc, streaming, transaction landing, indexing) avoids assembling multiple point vendors.