Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 30, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (2) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Cyfrin Cyfrin is a leading smart contract security audit firm that has secured over $50 billion in TVL across multiple blockchains including Solana. The firm conducts thorough manual code reviews of Solana p... Fystack Fystack delivers enterprise-grade MPC (multi-party computation) wallet infrastructure built for fintechs, payment platforms, and crypto businesses operating on Solana and 10+ other blockchains. Rather...
Fystack is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Cyfrin (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Cyfrin uses a paid model, while Fystack is paid.
Cyfrin offers 5 features including Manual smart contract audits for Solana/Rust, Free Solana Development Course on Updraft, $50B+ TVL secured across chains, and 2 more. Fystack counters with 5 features including MPC threshold-signature security with no single point of failure, Self-hosted or managed SaaS deployment options, API-first architecture for embedding custody into apps, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Cyfrin currently has a healthy health status with 99.2% uptime over the last 30 days. Fystack is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Cyfrin's key strengths include industry-leading audit reputation, free developer education platform, deep solana/rust expertise. Fystack stands out for removes single-key risk through multi-party computation, flexible deployment to match compliance and control needs, supports solana plus 10+ blockchains from one platform. On the flip side, Cyfrin's weaknesses include audit waitlists can be long, while Fystack's main drawback is aimed at businesses and developers, not retail users.
More comparisons
Compare Cyfrin with…
Compare Fystack with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 16,235 | 263 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit, Wallets, Payment Tools |
| Description | Smart contract security audits and free developer education for Solana and Rust programs | Enterprise-grade MPC wallet infrastructure for Solana and multi-chain |
Both Cyfrin and Fystack operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Fystack has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Cyfrin's pricing and check Fystack's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.