Head-to-head · RPC Providers
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (2) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
DexterLab DexterLab is an enterprise-grade Solana data infrastructure provider offering archival RPC, real-time data streams, and historical blockchain data access. It targets teams that need reliable, large-sc... RPC Fast RPC Fast is a low-latency Solana RPC and data-streaming provider built for high-throughput, latency-sensitive applications. Its hook is delivering early on-chain signals and fast transaction routing f...
RPC Fast is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 4.0/5 for DexterLab (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
DexterLab uses a paid model, while RPC Fast is paid — https://rpcfast.com/pricing.
DexterLab offers 5 features including Archival RPC for deep historical Solana data access, Real-time data streams via dedicated Kafka clusters, Historical blockchain data for analytics and backtesting, and 2 more. RPC Fast counters with 5 features including Low-latency Solana RPC access, gRPC streaming (Yellowstone, Shredstream, Aperture), Direct validator shred intake, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. DexterLab currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. RPC Fast is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
DexterLab's key strengths include enterprise-grade reliability with delivery-rate guarantees, covers both real-time streams and deep historical data, proven by major customers like google and the solana foundation. RPC Fast stands out for built for latency-critical trading workloads, multiple streaming options for raw data, early signal access ahead of block confirmation. On the flip side, DexterLab's weaknesses include aimed at developers and businesses, not end users, while RPC Fast's main drawback is specialized for advanced builders, not general devs.
More comparisons
Compare DexterLab with…
Compare RPC Fast with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 3 |
| Twitter Followers | 12,407 | 454 |
| Categories | Data & Indexing, RPC Providers | RPC Providers |
| Description | Web3 data warehouse with Solana archival RPC and real-time streams | Low-latency Solana RPC + data streaming for high-scale dApps, HFT, DeFi, and on-chain analytics. |
Both DexterLab and RPC Fast operate in the rpc providers space, so this is a direct head-to-head. RPC Fast has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check DexterLab's pricing and check RPC Fast's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.