Head-to-head · RPC Providers
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 15, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
DoubleZero DoubleZero is a decentralized, token-incentivized networking layer that routes blockchain traffic over dedicated high-performance fiber links instead of the public internet. Its goal is to give valida... RockawayX RockawayX is a blockchain infrastructure operator and investment firm that has run validators and bare-metal nodes since 2020, positioning itself among the earliest dedicated Solana infrastructure pro...
DoubleZero is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for RockawayX (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
DoubleZero uses a paid model, while RockawayX is paid.
DoubleZero offers 5 features including Dedicated fiber backbone bypassing public internet, Multicast block propagation to validators, Token-incentivized contributed infrastructure, and 2 more. RockawayX counters with 5 features including Bare-metal dedicated RPC nodes, Self-operated data centers and custom hardware, Proof-of-stake validators across 50+ networks, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. DoubleZero currently has a healthy health status with 99.0% uptime over the last 30 days. RockawayX is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
DoubleZero's key strengths include reduces transaction propagation latency for validators, backbone contributed by multiple independent providers, targets institutional-grade connectivity. RockawayX stands out for long-standing operator with deep solana infrastructure experience, owned hardware and data centers rather than reseller cloud, dedicated configurations and direct engineering contact. On the flip side, DoubleZero's weaknesses include only relevant to validator/infrastructure operators, not end users, while RockawayX's main drawback is enterprise-focused with bespoke, non-transparent pricing.
More comparisons
Compare DoubleZero with…
Compare RockawayX with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 63,596 | 11,267 |
| Categories | Developer Tools, RPC Providers | RPC Providers |
| Description | High-speed dedicated fiber network for Solana validators and infrastructure | OG Solana infrastructure with enterprise bare-metal RPC nodes |
Both DoubleZero and RockawayX operate in the rpc providers space, so this is a direct head-to-head. DoubleZero has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check DoubleZero's pricing and check RockawayX's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.