Head-to-head · Bridges
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Eclipse Eclipse is the first Ethereum Layer 2 built on the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM), combining Ethereum's security and liquidity with Solana's parallel execution engine. Live on mainnet since late 2024, E... LI.FI LI.FI is a cross-chain bridge and DEX aggregation layer that routes swaps and transfers across many blockchains, including Solana. Its hook is one integration giving access to aggregated liquidity acr...
Eclipse is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for LI.FI (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Eclipse uses a free model, while LI.FI is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Eclipse offers 5 features including Solana VM execution on Ethereum L2, 1,000+ TPS with parallel transaction processing, Native Ethereum bridge for asset transfers, and 2 more. LI.FI counters with 5 features including Bridge and DEX aggregation across 60+ chains, API, SDK, and embeddable trading widget, Best-execution routing across liquidity sources, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Eclipse currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. LI.FI is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Eclipse's key strengths include best of both ethereum and solana ecosystems, high throughput from svm execution, ethereum-grade security via settlement. LI.FI stands out for single integration for broad multi-chain liquidity, multiple integration paths for developers, aggregates well-known dexs and bridges. On the flip side, Eclipse's weaknesses include additional bridge risk between ethereum and eclipse, while LI.FI's main drawback is multi-chain platform where solana is one of 60+ chains.
More comparisons
Compare Eclipse with…
Compare LI.FI with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 235,153 | 268,972 |
| Categories | Developer Tools, Bridges | Bridges |
| Description | Ethereum L2 powered by the Solana Virtual Machine for high-throughput dApps | Multi-chain bridge and DEX aggregator with Solana support |
Both Eclipse and LI.FI operate in the bridges space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Eclipse has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Eclipse is free to start and LI.FI is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.