Head-to-head · Wallets
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 15, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Eco Eco is a user-friendly crypto wallet and payment application that simplifies everyday cryptocurrency transactions on Solana and other chains. It targets people who want to use crypto for practical, da... Orangefin Orangefin is a non-custodial mobile staking wallet for Solana, built by Sol Strategies, a Nasdaq-listed blockchain infrastructure company. It lets users stake SOL directly from their phone while keepi...
Both Eco and Orangefin hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Eco uses a free model, while Orangefin is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Eco offers 5 features including Clean interface for sending, receiving, and spending crypto, Support for Solana and other chains, Built-in DeFi features to earn yield on holdings, and 2 more. Orangefin counters with 5 features including Non-custodial mobile staking for Solana, 0% commission staking, Automatic Jito MEV reward harvesting, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Eco currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Orangefin is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Eco's key strengths include approachable interface lowers the barrier for new users, combines payments and yield in a single app, multi-chain support beyond just solana. Orangefin stands out for non-custodial — users keep control of their keys, 0% commission maximizes staking returns, automatic mev harvesting adds reward on top of yield. On the flip side, Eco's weaknesses include solana is one of several supported chains, not the sole focus, while Orangefin's main drawback is staking apy is variable and not guaranteed.
More comparisons
Compare Eco with…
Compare Orangefin with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 38,006 | 1,208 |
| Categories | Wallets, Payment Tools | Wallets, Staking |
| Description | Simple crypto wallet and payment app for everyday transactions on Solana | Non-custodial Solana staking app with 0% commission and MEV rewards |
Both Eco and Orangefin operate in the wallets space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Eco is free to start and Orangefin is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.