Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Edgevana Edgevana simplifies the otherwise demanding process of running a Solana validator by providing automated deployment, monitoring, and management tools. Operating a validator normally means provisioning... Figment Figment is one of the world's largest blockchain infrastructure companies, providing institutional-grade staking services across 40+ protocols including Solana. Their Solana staking offering includes...
Figment is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Edgevana (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Edgevana uses a paid model, while Figment is paid.
Edgevana offers 5 features including Automated, one-click Solana validator deployment, Dashboard-based validator monitoring and management, Performance-optimized validator configurations, and 2 more. Figment counters with 5 features including Institutional Solana staking with enterprise SLAs, Staking API for programmatic management, White-label staking solutions, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Edgevana currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Figment is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Edgevana's key strengths include drastically lowers the devops barrier to running a validator, optimized configs aim for strong validator performance, single dashboard simplifies ongoing monitoring and management. Figment stands out for top-tier institutional reputation, billions in staked assets, comprehensive apis for integration. On the flip side, Edgevana's weaknesses include running a validator still carries real cost and responsibility, while Figment's main drawback is premium institutional pricing.
More comparisons
Compare Edgevana with…
Compare Figment with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 2,483 | 27,188 |
| Categories | Staking | Staking |
| Description | One-click Solana validator deployment and management platform | Institutional-grade staking infrastructure for Solana with APIs and white-label solutions |
Both Edgevana and Figment operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Figment has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Edgevana's pricing and check Figment's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.