Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 30, 2026
 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (0) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 4 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Elliptic Elliptic provides blockchain analytics, compliance screening, and risk-management solutions covering Solana and 40+ blockchains. It is established compliance infrastructure for institutions. Its tool... Three Sigma Three Sigma is a Web3 security firm specializing in smart contract audits, economic risk modeling, and exploit prevention across multiple ecosystems including Solana. With 150+ audits completed protec...
Elliptic is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Three Sigma (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Elliptic uses a paid model, while Three Sigma is paid.
Elliptic offers 5 features including Blockchain analytics across Solana and 40+ chains, Compliance screening and transaction monitoring, AML/KYC tooling, and 2 more. Three Sigma counters with 4 features including Comprehensive Rust and Solana smart contract audits, Economic risk modeling for DeFi protocols, Threat modeling for CPI injection and signer vulnerabilities, and 1 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Elliptic currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Three Sigma is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Elliptic's key strengths include established institutional compliance platform, broad multi-chain coverage including solana, trusted by regulated entities. Three Sigma stands out for extensive audit track record with $10b+ protected, multi-chain rust expertise across solana, near, and polkadot. On the flip side, Elliptic's weaknesses include enterprise compliance product, not for retail, while Three Sigma's main drawback is not exclusively solana-focused.
More comparisons
Compare Elliptic with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 18,830 | 13,094 |
| Categories | Security & Audit, Analytics & Charts | Security & Audit |
| Description | Blockchain analytics and crypto compliance for institutions | Web3 security audits and economic risk modeling for Solana and beyond |
Both Elliptic and Three Sigma operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Elliptic has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Elliptic's pricing and check Three Sigma's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.