Head-to-head · DeFi & Yield
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated November 9, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
FBYT FBYT is an on-chain asset management platform on Solana that connects investors with money managers through non-custodial vaults. Capital stays under the control of smart contracts and transparent on-... KAIO KAIO (formerly Libre Capital) is a Nomura/Brevan Howard joint venture tokenizing institutional funds on Solana. It brings traditionally exclusive private-market funds on-chain. It launched Hamilton L...
KAIO is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for FBYT (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
FBYT uses a free model, while KAIO is paid. FBYT has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though KAIO's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
FBYT offers 5 features including Non-custodial vaults — capital is controlled by smart contracts, not a custodian, Live on-chain performance data: activity, balances, fees and full history, Manager tooling to create vaults, set terms, accept deposits and run strategies, and 2 more. KAIO counters with 5 features including Institutional fund tokenization on Solana, Nomura/Brevan Howard joint venture, Hamilton Lane's $556M SCOPE private-credit fund tokenized, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. FBYT currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. KAIO is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
FBYT's key strengths include funds remain in smart contracts, so the platform never takes custody, a manager's full track record is visible on-chain before you allocate capital, withdrawals do not require manager approval or a lock-up window.
More comparisons
Compare FBYT with…
Compare KAIO with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 8,208 | 35,634 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield | DeFi & Yield |
| Description | Non-custodial vaults connecting investors with on-chain money managers | Institutional fund tokenization bringing Hamilton Lane private credit to Solana |
Both FBYT and KAIO operate in the defi & yield space, so this is a direct head-to-head. KAIO has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — FBYT is free to start and check KAIO's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.