Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Figment Figment is one of the world's largest blockchain infrastructure companies, providing institutional-grade staking services across 40+ protocols including Solana. Their Solana staking offering includes... Jito Restaking Jito Restaking is restaking infrastructure on Solana from the Jito team that lets users restake SOL or liquid staking tokens to help secure additional protocols and earn extra yield. It extends Solana...
Figment is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Jito Restaking (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Figment uses a paid model, while Jito Restaking is free. Jito Restaking has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Figment's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Figment offers 5 features including Institutional Solana staking with enterprise SLAs, Staking API for programmatic management, White-label staking solutions, and 2 more. Jito Restaking counters with 5 features including Restake SOL or liquid staking tokens on Solana, Secure additional protocols and services, Earn extra yield on top of base staking rewards, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Figment currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Jito Restaking is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Figment's key strengths include top-tier institutional reputation, billions in staked assets, comprehensive apis for integration. Jito Restaking stands out for backed by the established jito team, additional yield from already-staked assets, brings the restaking model to solana. On the flip side, Figment's weaknesses include premium institutional pricing, while Jito Restaking's main drawback is restaking adds layered, compounding risk versus plain staking.
More comparisons
Compare Figment with…
Compare Jito Restaking with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 27,188 | 103,690 |
| Categories | Staking | Staking, Liquid Staking |
| Description | Institutional-grade staking infrastructure for Solana with APIs and white-label solutions | Restaking infrastructure on Solana |
Both Figment and Jito Restaking operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Figment has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Figment's pricing and Jito Restaking is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.