Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Figment Figment is one of the world's largest blockchain infrastructure companies, providing institutional-grade staking services across 40+ protocols including Solana. Their Solana staking offering includes... Kiln Kiln is the leading institutional staking platform operating 50,000+ validators and managing over $14 billion in staked assets across 50+ Proof-of-Stake networks. For Solana, Kiln represents approxima...
Both Figment and Kiln hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Figment uses a paid model, while Kiln is freemium.
Figment offers 5 features including Institutional Solana staking with enterprise SLAs, Staking API for programmatic management, White-label staking solutions, and 2 more. Kiln counters with 7 features including 50,000+ validators across 50+ PoS networks, $14B+ in managed staked assets, 2.5% of entire Solana network stake, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Figment currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Kiln is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Figment's key strengths include top-tier institutional reputation, billions in staked assets, comprehensive apis for integration. Kiln stands out for enterprise-grade with soc 2 compliance, massive scale provides reliability, no minimum makes it accessible to everyone. On the flip side, Figment's weaknesses include premium institutional pricing, while Kiln's main drawback is primarily targets institutional clients.
Both Figment and Kiln operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. We recommend trying both — check Figment's pricing and Kiln is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.
More comparisons
Compare Figment with…
Compare Kiln with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 27,188 | 11,965 |
| Categories | Staking | Staking |
| Description | Institutional-grade staking infrastructure for Solana with APIs and white-label solutions | Enterprise-grade staking platform managing $14B+ across 50+ PoS networks including Solana |