Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Figment Figment is one of the world's largest blockchain infrastructure companies, providing institutional-grade staking services across 40+ protocols including Solana. Their Solana staking offering includes... Layer33 Layer33 is a coalition of 25 independent Solana validators focused on network decentralization, with roughly 18M SOL of combined stake. Rather than a single operator, it organizes independent validato...
Figment is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Layer33 (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Figment uses a paid model, while Layer33 is free. Layer33 has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Figment's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Figment offers 5 features including Institutional Solana staking with enterprise SLAs, Staking API for programmatic management, White-label staking solutions, and 2 more. Layer33 counters with 5 features including Coalition of 25 independent Solana validators, IndieSOL composable liquid staking token, Standard staking rewards while keeping liquidity, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Figment currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Layer33 is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Figment's key strengths include top-tier institutional reputation, billions in staked assets, comprehensive apis for integration. Layer33 stands out for actively supports solana validator decentralization, indiesol is usable across defi while earning, stake spread across many independent operators. On the flip side, Figment's weaknesses include premium institutional pricing, while Layer33's main drawback is indiesol is smaller and less liquid than leading lsts.
More comparisons
Compare Figment with…
Compare Layer33 with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 27,188 | 103,868 |
| Categories | Staking | Staking, Liquid Staking |
| Description | Institutional-grade staking infrastructure for Solana with APIs and white-label solutions | Coalition of 25 independent Solana validators with IndieSOL liquid staking |
Both Figment and Layer33 operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Figment has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Figment's pricing and Layer33 is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.