Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Figment Figment is one of the world's largest blockchain infrastructure companies, providing institutional-grade staking services across 40+ protocols including Solana. Their Solana staking offering includes... Orangefin Orangefin is a non-custodial mobile staking wallet for Solana, built by Sol Strategies, a Nasdaq-listed blockchain infrastructure company. It lets users stake SOL directly from their phone while keepi...
Both Figment and Orangefin hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Figment uses a paid model, while Orangefin is free. Orangefin has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Figment's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Figment offers 5 features including Institutional Solana staking with enterprise SLAs, Staking API for programmatic management, White-label staking solutions, and 2 more. Orangefin counters with 5 features including Non-custodial mobile staking for Solana, 0% commission staking, Automatic Jito MEV reward harvesting, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Figment currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Orangefin is rated healthy with 99.2% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Figment's key strengths include top-tier institutional reputation, billions in staked assets, comprehensive apis for integration. Orangefin stands out for non-custodial — users keep control of their keys, 0% commission maximizes staking returns, automatic mev harvesting adds reward on top of yield. On the flip side, Figment's weaknesses include premium institutional pricing, while Orangefin's main drawback is staking apy is variable and not guaranteed.
More comparisons
Compare Figment with…
Compare Orangefin with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 27,188 | 1,224 |
| Categories | Staking | Wallets, Staking |
| Description | Institutional-grade staking infrastructure for Solana with APIs and white-label solutions | Non-custodial Solana staking app with 0% commission and MEV rewards |
Both Figment and Orangefin operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check Figment's pricing and Orangefin is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.