Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Figment Figment is one of the world's largest blockchain infrastructure companies, providing institutional-grade staking services across 40+ protocols including Solana. Their Solana staking offering includes... SolanaHub SolanaHub is an all-in-one dashboard that consolidates a user's entire Solana footprint into a single interface. Instead of juggling separate sites for tracking holdings, staking, DeFi positions, and...
Both Figment and SolanaHub hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Figment uses a paid model, while SolanaHub is free. SolanaHub has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Figment's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Figment offers 5 features including Institutional Solana staking with enterprise SLAs, Staking API for programmatic management, White-label staking solutions, and 2 more. SolanaHub counters with 5 features including Unified portfolio tracking across Solana holdings, Staking via the hubSOL liquid staking token, DeFi protocol integrations for managing positions in one place, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Figment currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. SolanaHub is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Figment's key strengths include top-tier institutional reputation, billions in staked assets, comprehensive apis for integration. SolanaHub stands out for consolidates portfolio, staking, defi, and nfts into one interface, hubsol lets users stake while retaining liquidity, live notifications from 15+ dapps give a unified activity view. On the flip side, Figment's weaknesses include premium institutional pricing, while SolanaHub's main drawback is usefulness depends on its many dapp integrations staying current.
More comparisons
Compare Figment with…
Compare SolanaHub with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 27,188 | — |
| Categories | Staking | Portfolio Trackers, Staking |
| Description | Institutional-grade staking infrastructure for Solana with APIs and white-label solutions | All-in-one Solana dashboard for portfolio tracking, staking, and DeFi |
Both Figment and SolanaHub operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check Figment's pricing and SolanaHub is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.