Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Figment Figment is one of the world's largest blockchain infrastructure companies, providing institutional-grade staking services across 40+ protocols including Solana. Their Solana staking offering includes... Starke Finance Starke Finance is a Solana staking-analytics platform that helps users compare validators on performance, fees, and security to make informed delegation decisions. It is a research tool, not a staking...
Figment is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.0/5 for Starke Finance (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Figment uses a paid model, while Starke Finance is free. Starke Finance has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Figment's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Figment offers 5 features including Institutional Solana staking with enterprise SLAs, Staking API for programmatic management, White-label staking solutions, and 2 more. Starke Finance counters with 5 features including Validator comparison across performance, fees, and security, Detailed validator rankings, APY comparisons, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Figment currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Starke Finance is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Figment's key strengths include top-tier institutional reputation, billions in staked assets, comprehensive apis for integration. Starke Finance stands out for helps pick reliable, well-priced validators, combines metrics with educational guides, transparency before delegating. On the flip side, Figment's weaknesses include premium institutional pricing, while Starke Finance's main drawback is analytics only — you stake elsewhere.
More comparisons
Compare Figment with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 27,188 | 717 |
| Categories | Staking | Staking, Analytics & Charts |
| Description | Institutional-grade staking infrastructure for Solana with APIs and white-label solutions | Solana validator comparison and staking analytics platform |
Both Figment and Starke Finance operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Figment has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Figment's pricing and Starke Finance is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.