Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 6 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Figment Figment is one of the world's largest blockchain infrastructure companies, providing institutional-grade staking services across 40+ protocols including Solana. Their Solana staking offering includes... VanEck VanEck is a global investment management firm with $100B+ AUM that has been a strong Solana advocate. Filed one of the first Solana ETF applications, approved in October 2025. Also exploring tokenized...
Both Figment and VanEck hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Figment uses a paid model, while VanEck is paid.
Figment offers 5 features including Institutional Solana staking with enterprise SLAs, Staking API for programmatic management, White-label staking solutions, and 2 more. VanEck counters with 6 features including Solana ETF, $100B+ AUM globally, Tokenized fund products, and 3 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Figment currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. VanEck is rated healthy. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Figment's key strengths include top-tier institutional reputation, billions in staked assets, comprehensive apis for integration. VanEck stands out for established 70+ year track record, early solana etf advocate, active in solana tokenization. On the flip side, Figment's weaknesses include premium institutional pricing, while VanEck's main drawback is management fees apply.
Both Figment and VanEck operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check Figment's pricing and check VanEck's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.
More comparisons
Compare Figment with…
Compare VanEck with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 27,188 | 116,401 |
| Categories | Staking | Staking |
| Description | Institutional-grade staking infrastructure for Solana with APIs and white-label solutions | Global asset manager — Solana ETF and tokenized fund products |