Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (4) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Fogo Fogo is a high-performance Layer 1 blockchain running pure Firedancer — the high-performance Solana Virtual Machine client built by Jump Crypto. It is SVM-compatible but a separate network from Solana... GetBlock GetBlock is a multi-chain RPC node provider that gives developers API access to blockchain networks, including Solana, through both shared and dedicated nodes. The hook: one provider for Solana plus 1...
Both Fogo and GetBlock hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Fogo uses a free model, while GetBlock is freemium. Fogo has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though GetBlock's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Fogo offers 5 features including SVM-compatible Layer 1 running pure Firedancer, Very low block times (~40ms target), High throughput (1,200+ TPS claimed), and 2 more. GetBlock counters with 5 features including Solana RPC among 100+ chains, Shared multi-tenant nodes, Dedicated private nodes, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Fogo currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. GetBlock is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Fogo's key strengths include performance-focused design for trading apps, svm compatibility eases developer migration, built on the firedancer client lineage. GetBlock stands out for broad multi-chain coverage, free tier to start, dedicated nodes for heavy workloads. On the flip side, Fogo's weaknesses include a separate network, not solana mainnet, while GetBlock's main drawback is general provider, solana is one of 100+ chains.
More comparisons
Compare Fogo with…
Compare GetBlock with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 5 |
| Twitter Followers | 748 | 23,949 |
| Categories | Developer Tools | RPC Providers |
| Description | High-performance SVM Layer 1 optimized for DeFi | Multi-chain RPC provider with free and paid Solana nodes — shared and dedicated endpoints for dApps, bots, and analytics |
While Fogo (Developer Tools) and GetBlock (RPC Providers) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Fogo is free to start and GetBlock is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.