Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (5) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 10 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
FrogLabs Terminal FrogLabs Terminal is a local-first desktop application for Solana memecoin creators and traders, built around a single principle: "Solana bots without the cloud." Unlike browser and Telegram bundlers... Umi Umi is Metaplex's zero-dependency, modular JavaScript framework for building type-safe clients that interact with Solana programs. Rather than locking developers into a single, monolithic SDK, Umi is...
FrogLabs Terminal is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 5 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Umi (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
FrogLabs Terminal uses a freemium model, while Umi is free. Umi has the edge for budget-conscious users, though FrogLabs Terminal's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
FrogLabs Terminal offers 10 features including Non-custodial, local-first architecture — keys are created and stored only on your device; no cloud wallets, remote signing, or servers, One-shot multi-launchpad deploy across Pump.fun, Raydium LaunchLab, Bonk, Bags, and Meteora DBC, Sub-wallet management: fund, rotate, and bundle dozens of sub-wallets with pre-configured buys at deploy time, and 7 more. Umi counters with 5 features including Zero-dependency, modular core for type-safe Solana clients, Plugin architecture for swapping RPC, signer, and serializer implementations, First-class integrations for all Metaplex programs, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. FrogLabs Terminal currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Umi is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
FrogLabs Terminal's key strengths include true self-custody — keys never leave the device, with no telemetry or trade proxying, removing the custody/rug risk that cloud bundlers carry, broad launchpad coverage (pump.fun, raydium launchlab, bonk, bags, meteora) from a single one-shot deploy flow, reusable, versioned blueprints make complex multi-wallet strategies repeatable and shareable.
More comparisons
Compare FrogLabs Terminal with…
Compare Umi with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 5 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 383 | 113,733 |
| Categories | Token Launchers, Meme Tools, Trading Bots | SDKs & Libraries, Developer Tools |
| Description | Serverless, non-custodial desktop terminal for launching and bundling Solana memecoins — private keys never leave your machine. | Metaplex's modular JavaScript framework for Solana programs |
While FrogLabs Terminal (Token Launchers) and Umi (SDKs & Libraries) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. FrogLabs Terminal has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — FrogLabs Terminal is free to start and Umi is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.