Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 30, 2026
![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Fystack Fystack delivers enterprise-grade MPC (multi-party computation) wallet infrastructure built for fintechs, payment platforms, and crypto businesses operating on Solana and 10+ other blockchains. Rather... Kerberus Kerberus is a Web3 security tool that protects wallets from scams, delivering 99.9% scam detection through its Sentinel3 browser extension. It covers both EVM chains and Solana, positioning itself as...
Fystack is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 4.0/5 for Kerberus (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Fystack uses a paid model, while Kerberus is free. Kerberus has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Fystack's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Fystack offers 5 features including MPC threshold-signature security with no single point of failure, Self-hosted or managed SaaS deployment options, API-first architecture for embedding custody into apps, and 2 more. Kerberus counters with 5 features including Sentinel3 browser extension with 99.9% scam detection, Pre-signing warnings for malicious transactions, Risky contract approval and phishing-site detection, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Fystack currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Kerberus is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Fystack's key strengths include removes single-key risk through multi-party computation, flexible deployment to match compliance and control needs, supports solana plus 10+ blockchains from one platform. Kerberus stands out for proactive pre-signing protection stops drains before they happen, reports 250k+ users and zero losses over 3+ years, covers both solana and evm chains.
More comparisons
Compare Fystack with…
Compare Kerberus with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 263 | 17,038 |
| Categories | Security & Audit, Wallets, Payment Tools | Security & Audit |
| Description | Enterprise-grade MPC wallet infrastructure for Solana and multi-chain | Web3 wallet protection with 99.9% scam detection via browser extension |
Both Fystack and Kerberus operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Fystack has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Fystack's pricing and Kerberus is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.