Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (0) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Fair |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Fystack Fystack delivers enterprise-grade MPC (multi-party computation) wallet infrastructure built for fintechs, payment platforms, and crypto businesses operating on Solana and 10+ other blockchains. Rather... SharkTeam SharkTeam is a Web3 security provider offering comprehensive services for Solana programs, spanning audits, monitoring, and compliance. It combines pre-launch review with ongoing protection. Its serv...
Fystack is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for SharkTeam (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Fystack uses a paid model, while SharkTeam is paid.
Fystack offers 5 features including MPC threshold-signature security with no single point of failure, Self-hosted or managed SaaS deployment options, API-first architecture for embedding custody into apps, and 2 more. SharkTeam counters with 5 features including Smart-contract auditing for Solana programs, On-chain risk alerting and monitoring, KYT/AML compliance tooling, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Fystack currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. SharkTeam is rated fair with 93.2% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Fystack's key strengths include removes single-key risk through multi-party computation, flexible deployment to match compliance and control needs, supports solana plus 10+ blockchains from one platform. SharkTeam stands out for covers audits, monitoring, and compliance together, combines automated and manual analysis, on-chain alerting catches post-launch threats. On the flip side, Fystack's weaknesses include aimed at businesses and developers, not retail users, while SharkTeam's main drawback is b2b security service, not for end users.
More comparisons
Compare Fystack with…
Compare SharkTeam with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 263 | 6,793 |
| Categories | Security & Audit, Wallets, Payment Tools | Security & Audit |
| Description | Enterprise-grade MPC wallet infrastructure for Solana and multi-chain | Web3 security provider with auditing and on-chain monitoring |
Both Fystack and SharkTeam operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Fystack has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Fystack's pricing and check SharkTeam's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.