Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 23, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 6 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Fystack Fystack delivers enterprise-grade MPC (multi-party computation) wallet infrastructure built for fintechs, payment platforms, and crypto businesses operating on Solana and 10+ other blockchains. Rather... Surfshark Surfshark is a VPN service popular with crypto traders for its unlimited simultaneous device connections and low price point (~$2.49/mo on 2-year plans). Connect every phone, laptop, and bot server un...
Both Fystack and Surfshark hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Fystack uses a paid model, while Surfshark is paid.
Fystack offers 5 features including MPC threshold-signature security with no single point of failure, Self-hosted or managed SaaS deployment options, API-first architecture for embedding custody into apps, and 2 more. Surfshark counters with 6 features including Unlimited simultaneous device connections, 3,200+ servers in 100 countries, WireGuard protocol for speed, and 3 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Fystack currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Surfshark is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Fystack's key strengths include removes single-key risk through multi-party computation, flexible deployment to match compliance and control needs, supports solana plus 10+ blockchains from one platform. Surfshark stands out for unlimited devices — cover all your trading machines, cheapest major vpn (~$2.49/mo), cleanweb blocks phishing links. On the flip side, Fystack's weaknesses include aimed at businesses and developers, not retail users, while Surfshark's main drawback is slightly slower than nordvpn on some routes.
More comparisons
Compare Fystack with…
Compare Surfshark with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 263 | 22,083 |
| Categories | Security & Audit, Wallets, Payment Tools | Security & Audit |
| Description | Enterprise-grade MPC wallet infrastructure for Solana and multi-chain | Budget-friendly VPN with unlimited devices — the cheapest way to access any exchange from anywhere |
Both Fystack and Surfshark operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check Fystack's pricing and check Surfshark's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.