Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 30, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (6) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our link, at no extra cost to you.
Pros & cons
Analysis
GetBlock GetBlock is a multi-chain RPC node provider that gives developers API access to blockchain networks, including Solana, through both shared and dedicated nodes. The hook: one provider for Solana plus 1... Picasso Network Picasso Network enables SOL restaking to secure Actively Validated Services and provides trust-minimized IBC connections between Solana and Cosmos ecosystems. Supports SOL, mSOL, jitoSOL, and bSOL for...
GetBlock is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.8/5 stars across 6 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Picasso Network (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
GetBlock uses a freemium model, while Picasso Network is free. Picasso Network has the edge for budget-conscious users, though GetBlock's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
GetBlock offers 5 features including Solana RPC among 100+ chains, Shared multi-tenant nodes, Dedicated private nodes, and 2 more. Picasso Network counters with 5 features including SOL and LST restaking for AVS security, IBC bridge connecting Solana to Cosmos, Fee-sharing model for stakers and restakers, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. GetBlock currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Picasso Network is rated healthy with 28.1% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
GetBlock's key strengths include broad multi-chain coverage, free tier to start, dedicated nodes for heavy workloads. Picasso Network stands out for first protocol bringing ibc interoperability to solana, attractive fee-sharing rewards for restakers, expands solana cross-chain connectivity. On the flip side, GetBlock's weaknesses include general provider, solana is one of 100+ chains, while Picasso Network's main drawback is lower tvl than jito restaking.
More comparisons
Compare GetBlock with…
Compare Picasso Network with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 8 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 23,558 | — |
| Categories | RPC Providers | Staking, Bridges |
| Description | Multi-chain RPC provider with free and paid Solana nodes — shared and dedicated endpoints for dApps, bots, and analytics | Solana restaking protocol enabling IBC cross-chain connections to Cosmos |
While GetBlock (RPC Providers) and Picasso Network (Staking) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. GetBlock has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — GetBlock is free to start and Picasso Network is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.