Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (4) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
GetBlock GetBlock is a multi-chain RPC node provider that gives developers API access to blockchain networks, including Solana, through both shared and dedicated nodes. The hook: one provider for Solana plus 1... Rubic Rubic is a comprehensive cross-chain exchange aggregator that connects Solana to 70+ other blockchains through 340+ integrated DEXes, bridges, and intent-based protocols. Rather than routing through a...
GetBlock is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 4 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Rubic (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
GetBlock uses a freemium model, while Rubic is free. Rubic has the edge for budget-conscious users, though GetBlock's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
GetBlock offers 5 features including Solana RPC among 100+ chains, Shared multi-tenant nodes, Dedicated private nodes, and 2 more. Rubic counters with 5 features including Cross-chain swap aggregation across 70+ chains, 340+ integrated DEXes and bridges, Embeddable Widget SDK for developers, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. GetBlock currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Rubic is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
GetBlock's key strengths include broad multi-chain coverage, free tier to start, dedicated nodes for heavy workloads. Rubic stands out for massive protocol and chain coverage, best-route optimization saves money, developer-friendly widget for embedding. On the flip side, GetBlock's weaknesses include general provider, solana is one of 100+ chains, while Rubic's main drawback is aggregator adds a small fee layer.
More comparisons
Compare GetBlock with…
Compare Rubic with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 5 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 23,949 | 202,874 |
| Categories | RPC Providers | Bridges |
| Description | Multi-chain RPC provider with free and paid Solana nodes — shared and dedicated endpoints for dApps, bots, and analytics | Cross-chain DEX and bridge aggregator connecting 70+ chains with 340+ protocols |
While GetBlock (RPC Providers) and Rubic (Bridges) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. GetBlock has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — GetBlock is free to start and Rubic is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.