Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 9, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (6) | (4) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana + Robinhood Chain | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 8 |
This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our link, at no extra cost to you.
Pros & cons
Analysis
GetBlock GetBlock is a Web3 infrastructure provider that gives developers instant access to blockchain RPC nodes rather than requiring them to run their own, supporting more than 130 protocols across mainnet a... Sandglass Sandglass is a yield tokenization protocol on Solana that splits yield-bearing assets into two separate instruments: principal tokens (PT) and yield tokens (YT). By separating the principal from the f...
Both GetBlock and Sandglass hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
GetBlock uses a freemium model, while Sandglass is free. Sandglass has the edge for budget-conscious users, though GetBlock's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
GetBlock offers 5 features including Managed JSON-RPC, REST, WebSocket and GraphQL access to Robinhood Chain, Coverage of both RHC mainnet (chain ID 4663) and testnet (chain ID 46630), Shared usage-based plans billed in Compute Units, and 2 more. Sandglass counters with 5 features including Splits yield-bearing assets into principal tokens (PT) and yield tokens (YT), Fixed-rate yield locking via discounted principal tokens, Leveraged yield trading for amplified yield exposure, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. GetBlock currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sandglass is rated healthy with 99.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
GetBlock's key strengths include removes the need to run and maintain an arbitrum orbit node just to reach robinhood chain, dedicated-node tier gives high-volume rhc builders a predictable, unmetered option, standard evm-compatible rpc means existing ethereum tooling works against rhc endpoints unchanged.
More comparisons
Compare GetBlock with…
Compare Sandglass with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 23,458 | 3,217 |
| Categories | RPC Providers | DeFi & Yield |
| Description | Managed RPC node provider offering Robinhood Chain mainnet and testnet endpoints among 130+ supported chains | Yield tokenization protocol for Solana DeFi strategies |
While GetBlock (RPC Providers) and Sandglass (DeFi & Yield) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — GetBlock is free to start and Sandglass is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.