Head-to-head · Developer Tools
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 27, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana + Robinhood Chain | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Goldsky Goldsky is a blockchain data infrastructure provider that offers subgraph hosting and Mirror streaming pipelines for Solana and 140+ other chains. The platform is designed for developers who need reli... Reclaim Protocol Reclaim Protocol uses zkTLS infrastructure to let users prove facts about their Web2 data on-chain without exposing the underlying private information. It bridges the gap between the data people alrea...
Both Goldsky and Reclaim Protocol hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Goldsky uses a freemium model, while Reclaim Protocol is freemium. Both offer free tiers with paid upgrades, so try each before committing to a paid plan.
Goldsky offers 5 features including Subgraph hosting for Solana and 140+ chains, Mirror real-time data streaming pipelines, GraphQL API for indexed on-chain data, and 2 more. Reclaim Protocol counters with 5 features including zkTLS infrastructure for proving Web2 data on-chain, Zero-knowledge proofs that verify claims without exposing private data, Support for 250+ websites including bank, social, and ride data, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Goldsky currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Reclaim Protocol is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Goldsky's key strengths include eliminates need to build custom indexing infrastructure, real-time streaming reduces reliance on rpc polling, supports 140+ chains including solana. Reclaim Protocol stands out for lets users prove real-world data without revealing sensitive information, broad coverage across 250+ supported websites, backed by y combinator, polychain, and solana founders.
More comparisons
Compare Goldsky with…
Compare Reclaim Protocol with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | 11,412 | 8,446 |
| Categories | Developer Tools, Data & Indexing | Security & Audit, Developer Tools |
| Description | Real-time blockchain data infrastructure with subgraph hosting and streaming pipelines | Zero-knowledge proof identity verification for Solana dApps |
Both Goldsky and Reclaim Protocol operate in the developer tools space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Goldsky is free to start and Reclaim Protocol is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.