Head-to-head · Data & Indexing
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 11, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (2) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
HolderScan HolderScan delivers real-time holder analytics for tokens across Solana, Ethereum and Base. It breaks down a token's holder distribution, tracks whale concentration, and segments wallets into diamond... RedStone RedStone is a fast-growing blockchain oracle protocol, live on Solana, that delivers price feeds with sub-3ms latency. Oracles are the critical bridge that brings off-chain price data on-chain, and Re...
RedStone is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for HolderScan (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
HolderScan uses a freemium model, while RedStone is freemium. Both offer free tiers with paid upgrades, so try each before committing to a paid plan.
HolderScan offers 5 features including Real-time holder distribution charts, Whale and concentration tracking, Diamond-hands / accumulator / seller wallet segmentation, and 2 more. RedStone counters with 5 features including Price feeds with sub-3ms latency, Modular architecture offering push, pull, and extractable value oracle models, Support for 110+ chains including Solana, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. HolderScan currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. RedStone is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
HolderScan's key strengths include real-time holder data spanning solana, ethereum and base, concentration and whale metrics quickly surface risky distributions, wallet explorer plus api covers both manual and automated workflows. RedStone stands out for sub-3ms latency reduces stale-price risk in defi, modular models let integrators pick the right delivery method, broad multi-chain reach across 110+ chains.
More comparisons
Compare HolderScan with…
Compare RedStone with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 35,083 | 232,534 |
| Categories | Data & Indexing, Analytics & Charts | Data & Indexing |
| Description | Real-time token holder analytics — distribution, whales, and diamond hands | Ultra-low-latency modular oracle delivering price feeds to Solana |
Both HolderScan and RedStone operate in the data & indexing space, so this is a direct head-to-head. RedStone has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — HolderScan is free to start and RedStone is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.