Head-to-head · Data & Indexing
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated November 1, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (3) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 2 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Hyperstack Hyperstack by HyperTek is data-infrastructure-as-code for Solana: developers define a single schema relating their on-chain accounts, and the platform auto-provisions everything around it. From that o... Supanode Supanode is a Solana infrastructure provider built around a low-latency Frankfurt edge, packaging RPC, real-time streaming, transaction landing, and historical data into one stack instead of forcing t...
Both Hyperstack and Supanode hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Hyperstack uses a freemium model, while Supanode is paid.
Hyperstack offers 5 features including Single schema definition relating on-chain accounts, Auto-provisioned RPC management and account transforms, Websocket streaming generated from the schema, and 2 more. Supanode counters with 7 features including Yellowstone gRPC streaming (accounts, transactions, slots, blocks) at ~3.8ms p99 from Frankfurt with server-side filtering, ShredStream: raw block shreds over UDP at ~0.4ms p99 delivery, TPU Sender: stake-weighted transaction submission direct to slot leaders, bypassing the public mempool under congestion, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Hyperstack currently has a healthy health status with 28.3% uptime over the last 30 days. Supanode is rated healthy with 92.5% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Hyperstack's key strengths include schema-first workflow collapses backend and frontend data plumbing, generated react hooks speed the path from data to live ui, keeps on-chain backend and frontend in sync without glue code. Supanode stands out for frankfurt-based low-latency edge (sub-4ms grpc, sub-1ms shred delivery) suits latency-sensitive trading and mev workloads, stake-weighted tpu landing is independently benchmarked #1 of 18 submission services for getting transactions into blocks, integrated stack (rpc, streaming, transaction landing, indexing) avoids assembling multiple point vendors.
More comparisons
Compare Hyperstack with…
Compare Supanode with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 15,401 | 1,893 |
| Categories | Developer Tools, Data & Indexing | Data & Indexing, RPC Providers |
| Description | Data-infrastructure-as-code for Solana — schema in, RPC + streaming + React hooks out | Frankfurt-edge Solana RPC, gRPC streaming, ShredStream, and stake-weighted TPU transaction landing |
Both Hyperstack and Supanode operate in the data & indexing space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Hyperstack is free to start and check Supanode's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.