Head-to-head · Analytics & Charts
ICM Analytics vs Solscan
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 30, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (3) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 6 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
The trade-offs.
ICM Analytics
- Fundamentals-and-adoption angle is differentiated from typical chart/price-only tools
- Aggregates on-chain, social, and Web2 adoption data (app ratings, DAU) in one place
- Free entry tier lowers the barrier to evaluate the data
- Coverage is narrow — only a small curated set of tokens is tracked
- Headline platform stats are self-reported and the methodology isn't transparent
- Reliance on AI-agent signals and self-reported fundamentals carries data-quality risk
Solscan
- Most comprehensive and reliable Solana block explorer
- Default transaction verification tool linked by wallets and dApps
Analysis
Which should you choose?
.
Overview
ICM Analytics ICM Analytics is a fundamentals-focused crypto analytics platform positioning itself as the intelligence layer for Internet Capital Markets. Instead of hype-based trading, it tracks fundamental and ad... Solscan Solscan is the most widely used blockchain explorer for Solana, providing comprehensive tools for inspecting transactions, accounts, tokens, and on-chain programs. It serves as the default reference p...
Community Ratings
Both ICM Analytics and Solscan hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Pricing & Value
ICM Analytics uses a freemium model, while Solscan is freemium — Free explorer with basic analytics. Pro plans start at $39/month for advanced features and API access.. Both offer free tiers with paid upgrades, so try each before committing to a paid plan.
Key Features
ICM Analytics offers 6 features including Fundamental token metrics: revenue, P/E-style ratios, DAU, app-store ratings, holder counts, Live dashboards with holder tracking, limit-order and DCA monitoring, AI Feed tracking calls from monitored AI agents, and 3 more. Solscan counters with 8 features including Comprehensive transaction inspection with instruction-level detail, Token analytics with supply, holders, transfer history, and metadata, Account explorer showing balances, tokens, staking, and DeFi positions, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. ICM Analytics currently has a healthy health status with 90.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Solscan is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
ICM Analytics's key strengths include fundamentals-and-adoption angle is differentiated from typical chart/price-only tools, aggregates on-chain, social, and web2 adoption data (app ratings, dau) in one place, free entry tier lowers the barrier to evaluate the data.
More comparisons
Compare with another tool.
Compare ICM Analytics with…
Compare Solscan with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
More side-by-side breakdowns.
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.