Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (4) |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes |
This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our link, at no extra cost to you.
Pros & cons
Analysis
InfStones InfStones is an enterprise-grade blockchain infrastructure provider that manages over 20,000 nodes across 80+ protocols, including Solana. It gives institutional clients a single platform for running... Jupiter Jupiter is Solana's dominant DEX aggregator and the central hub for decentralized trading on the network. Processing billions of dollars in monthly volume, Jupiter routes trades across dozens of liqui...
Jupiter is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 4 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for InfStones (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
InfStones uses a paid model, while Jupiter is free — Free to use for swaps. Small platform fees on perps (0.1% taker, 0.01% maker). JUP token used for governance.. Jupiter has the edge for budget-conscious users, though InfStones's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
InfStones offers 5 features including Managed node infrastructure across 80+ blockchain protocols including Solana, Dedicated RPC endpoints for institutional-grade access, Validator staking services with a reported zero-slashing track record, and 2 more. Jupiter counters with 8 features including DEX aggregation across 20+ Solana liquidity sources for best-price routing, Perpetual futures trading (Jupiter Perps) with up to 100x leverage, Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA) with customizable intervals and amounts, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. InfStones currently has a healthy health status with 99.2% uptime over the last 30 days. Jupiter is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
InfStones's key strengths include trusted by major platforms such as binance and bitgo, broad multi-chain coverage from a single provider, removes the operational burden of running and monitoring node fleets.
More comparisons
Compare InfStones with…
Compare Jupiter with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 7 |
| Twitter Followers | 60,570 | 617,375 |
| Categories | RPC Providers, Staking | DEXs & Swaps |
| Description | Enterprise blockchain infrastructure — node management and staking across 80+ chains | The best swap aggregator and DeFi hub on Solana |
While InfStones (RPC Providers) and Jupiter (DEXs & Swaps) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Jupiter has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check InfStones's pricing and Jupiter is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.