Head-to-head · RPC Providers
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 2, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
InstantNodes InstantNodes is a Solana RPC provider offering dedicated and shared endpoints with instant provisioning. It gives teams a managed connection to Solana so they do not have to run their own validators o... Ligma Node Ligma Node provides private, high-performance Solana RPC nodes aimed at traders and automation that need low-latency network access. It markets dedicated bare-metal infrastructure rather than shared p...
InstantNodes is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Ligma Node (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
InstantNodes uses a freemium model, while Ligma Node is paid.
InstantNodes offers 5 features including Dedicated and shared Solana RPC endpoints, Instant endpoint provisioning, Low-latency connections, and 2 more. Ligma Node counters with 5 features including Dedicated bare-metal Solana RPC nodes, Multi-region (USA, EU, Asia) deployment, Geyser streaming support, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. InstantNodes currently has a healthy health status with 98.1% uptime over the last 30 days. Ligma Node is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
InstantNodes's key strengths include instant setup with no infrastructure to manage, choice of shared or dedicated capacity, websocket and low-latency support for real-time workloads. Ligma Node stands out for dedicated infrastructure, not shared endpoints, regional selection for lower latency, unlimited bandwidth and requests. On the flip side, InstantNodes's weaknesses include dependent on provider uptime and node freshness, while Ligma Node's main drawback is advertised tps figures are vendor estimates.
More comparisons
Compare InstantNodes with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 3,965 | 4,849 |
| Categories | RPC Providers | RPC Providers |
| Description | High-performance Solana RPC nodes with instant provisioning | High-performance Solana RPC nodes with up to 6,500 TPS on dedicated bare-metal servers |
Both InstantNodes and Ligma Node operate in the rpc providers space, so this is a direct head-to-head. InstantNodes has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — InstantNodes is free to start and check Ligma Node's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.