Head-to-head · RPC Providers
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (2) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
InstantNodes InstantNodes is a Solana RPC provider offering dedicated and shared endpoints with instant provisioning. It gives teams a managed connection to Solana so they do not have to run their own validators o... RPC Fast RPC Fast is a low-latency Solana RPC and data-streaming provider built for high-throughput, latency-sensitive applications. Its hook is delivering early on-chain signals and fast transaction routing f...
RPC Fast is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for InstantNodes (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
InstantNodes uses a freemium model, while RPC Fast is paid — https://rpcfast.com/pricing.
InstantNodes offers 5 features including Dedicated and shared Solana RPC endpoints, Instant endpoint provisioning, Low-latency connections, and 2 more. RPC Fast counters with 5 features including Low-latency Solana RPC access, gRPC streaming (Yellowstone, Shredstream, Aperture), Direct validator shred intake, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. InstantNodes currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. RPC Fast is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
InstantNodes's key strengths include instant setup with no infrastructure to manage, choice of shared or dedicated capacity, websocket and low-latency support for real-time workloads. RPC Fast stands out for built for latency-critical trading workloads, multiple streaming options for raw data, early signal access ahead of block confirmation. On the flip side, InstantNodes's weaknesses include dependent on provider uptime and node freshness, while RPC Fast's main drawback is specialized for advanced builders, not general devs.
More comparisons
Compare InstantNodes with…
Compare RPC Fast with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 3 |
| Twitter Followers | 3,965 | 454 |
| Categories | RPC Providers | RPC Providers |
| Description | High-performance Solana RPC nodes with instant provisioning | Low-latency Solana RPC + data streaming for high-scale dApps, HFT, DeFi, and on-chain analytics. |
Both InstantNodes and RPC Fast operate in the rpc providers space, so this is a direct head-to-head. RPC Fast has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — InstantNodes is free to start and check RPC Fast's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.