Head-to-head · RPC Providers
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 15, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Fair |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
InstantNodes InstantNodes is a Solana RPC provider offering dedicated and shared endpoints with instant provisioning. It gives teams a managed connection to Solana so they do not have to run their own validators o... Supanode Supanode is a Solana infrastructure provider built around a low-latency Frankfurt edge, packaging RPC, real-time streaming, transaction landing, and historical data into one stack instead of forcing t...
Both InstantNodes and Supanode hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
InstantNodes uses a freemium model, while Supanode is paid.
InstantNodes offers 5 features including Dedicated and shared Solana RPC endpoints, Instant endpoint provisioning, Low-latency connections, and 2 more. Supanode counters with 7 features including Yellowstone gRPC streaming (accounts, transactions, slots, blocks) at ~3.8ms p99 from Frankfurt with server-side filtering, ShredStream: raw block shreds over UDP at ~0.4ms p99 delivery, TPU Sender: stake-weighted transaction submission direct to slot leaders, bypassing the public mempool under congestion, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. InstantNodes currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Supanode is rated fair. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
InstantNodes's key strengths include instant setup with no infrastructure to manage, choice of shared or dedicated capacity, websocket and low-latency support for real-time workloads. Supanode stands out for frankfurt-based low-latency edge (sub-4ms grpc, sub-1ms shred delivery) suits latency-sensitive trading and mev workloads, stake-weighted tpu landing is independently benchmarked #1 of 18 submission services for getting transactions into blocks, integrated stack (rpc, streaming, transaction landing, indexing) avoids assembling multiple point vendors.
More comparisons
Compare InstantNodes with…
Compare Supanode with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 3,965 | 1,936 |
| Categories | RPC Providers | Data & Indexing, RPC Providers |
| Description | High-performance Solana RPC nodes with instant provisioning | Frankfurt-edge Solana RPC, gRPC streaming, ShredStream, and stake-weighted TPU transaction landing |
Both InstantNodes and Supanode operate in the rpc providers space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — InstantNodes is free to start and check Supanode's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.