Head-to-head · DeFi & Yield
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 30, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our link, at no extra cost to you.
Pros & cons
Analysis
Jito Jito is a major Solana protocol operating at the intersection of liquid staking and MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) infrastructure. It has become core infrastructure for the Solana network, with its v... Katana Katana is a structured yield protocol built on Solana that generates returns through automated, options-based strategies — primarily covered calls and put-selling. Rather than asking users to actively...
Jito is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Katana (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Jito uses a free model — No fee to stake. Jito takes a small management fee from staking + MEV rewards. Unstaking has a short cooldown period., while Katana is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Jito offers 8 features including JitoSOL liquid staking with staking rewards plus MEV tip earnings, Jito Block Engine for efficient MEV transaction ordering, Jito-Solana validator client used by majority of validators, and 5 more. Katana counters with 5 features including Automated covered call and put-selling options vaults, Simple deposit flow — no derivatives trading expertise required, Structured yield generation abstracted into one-click strategies, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Jito currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Katana is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Jito's key strengths include higher staking yields than standard liquid staking through mev tip sharing, core solana infrastructure — used by most validators on the network, jitosol deeply integrated across solana defi for composable use.
More comparisons
Compare Jito with…
Compare Katana with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 31,294 | 7 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking | DeFi & Yield |
| Description | Liquid staking and MEV protocol powering Solana validators | Structured yield protocol using automated options strategies on Solana |
Both Jito and Katana operate in the defi & yield space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Jito has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Jito is free to start and Katana is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.