Head-to-head · DeFi & Yield
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (4) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes |
This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our link, at no extra cost to you.
Pros & cons
Analysis
Jito Jito is a major Solana protocol operating at the intersection of liquid staking and MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) infrastructure. It has become core infrastructure for the Solana network, with its v... Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc...
Jito is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.8/5 for Sanctum (4 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Jito uses a free model — No fee to stake. Jito takes a small management fee from staking + MEV rewards. Unstaking has a short cooldown period., while Sanctum is free — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs.. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Jito offers 8 features including JitoSOL liquid staking with staking rewards plus MEV tip earnings, Jito Block Engine for efficient MEV transaction ordering, Jito-Solana validator client used by majority of validators, and 5 more. Sanctum counters with 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Jito currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sanctum is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Jito's key strengths include higher staking yields than standard liquid staking through mev tip sharing, core solana infrastructure — used by most validators on the network, jitosol deeply integrated across solana defi for composable use.
More comparisons
Compare Jito with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | 31,294 | 80,425 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking |
| Description | Liquid staking and MEV protocol powering Solana validators | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity |
Both Jito and Sanctum operate in the defi & yield space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Jito has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Jito is free to start and Sanctum is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.