Head-to-head · DEXs & Swaps
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 1 |
This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our link, at no extra cost to you.
Pros & cons
Analysis
Jupiter Terminal Jupiter Terminal is an open-source, embeddable swap component built by Jupiter, the leading swap aggregator on Solana. It lets developers drop full token-swap functionality into any webpage or dApp, s... Matcha Matcha is a decentralized exchange (DEX) aggregator built by 0x Labs that finds the best price for a token swap by routing across many liquidity sources — the 0x aggregation engine plus DEXs like Unis...
Both Jupiter Terminal and Matcha hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Jupiter Terminal uses a free model, while Matcha is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Jupiter Terminal offers 5 features including Open-source embeddable swap widget powered by Jupiter, Drops full token-swap functionality into any webpage or dApp, Automatic slippage management, retries, and transaction handling, and 2 more. Matcha counters with 5 features including Aggregates many DEXs and liquidity sources (0x, Uniswap, SushiSwap, 1inch) for best price, Cross-chain: Solana plus EVM networks in one app, Token risk scores and liquidity insights to flag scams, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Jupiter Terminal currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Matcha is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Jupiter Terminal's key strengths include adds production-grade swaps with minimal integration effort, open-source and powered by jupiter's aggregation, handles slippage, retries, and wallet connection out of the box. Matcha stands out for one of the few aggregators covering both solana and evm chains, optimal-route pricing aware of price impact and network fees, built-in scam/risk signals; self-custody.
More comparisons
Compare Jupiter Terminal with…
Compare Matcha with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 617,376 | 83,726 |
| Categories | DEXs & Swaps, Developer Tools | DEXs & Swaps |
| Description | Embeddable swap widget powered by Jupiter for any Solana dApp | Cross-chain DEX aggregator by 0x with Solana support |
Both Jupiter Terminal and Matcha operate in the dexs & swaps space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Jupiter Terminal is free to start and Matcha is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.