Head-to-head · Developer Tools
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 17, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our link, at no extra cost to you.
Pros & cons
Analysis
Jupiter Terminal Jupiter Terminal is an open-source, embeddable swap component built by Jupiter, the leading swap aggregator on Solana. It lets developers drop full token-swap functionality into any webpage or dApp, s... Neon EVM Neon EVM is a fully compatible Ethereum Virtual Machine that runs on Solana, letting developers deploy Solidity smart contracts and existing Ethereum dApps onto Solana without rewriting code. It acts...
Jupiter Terminal is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Neon EVM (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Jupiter Terminal uses a free model, while Neon EVM is freemium. Jupiter Terminal has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Neon EVM's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Jupiter Terminal offers 5 features including Open-source embeddable swap widget powered by Jupiter, Drops full token-swap functionality into any webpage or dApp, Automatic slippage management, retries, and transaction handling, and 2 more. Neon EVM counters with 5 features including Full Ethereum Virtual Machine compatibility running on Solana, Deploy existing Solidity smart contracts without code changes, Reuse of standard Ethereum developer tooling and frameworks, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Jupiter Terminal currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Neon EVM is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Jupiter Terminal's key strengths include adds production-grade swaps with minimal integration effort, open-source and powered by jupiter's aggregation, handles slippage, retries, and wallet connection out of the box.
More comparisons
Compare Jupiter Terminal with…
Compare Neon EVM with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 616,673 | 70,198 |
| Categories | DEXs & Swaps, Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| Description | Embeddable swap widget powered by Jupiter for any Solana dApp | Run Ethereum dApps natively on Solana with full EVM compatibility |
Both Jupiter Terminal and Neon EVM operate in the developer tools space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Jupiter Terminal has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Jupiter Terminal is free to start and Neon EVM is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.