Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 30, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 6 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Kerberus Kerberus is a Web3 security tool that protects wallets from scams, delivering 99.9% scam detection through its Sentinel3 browser extension. It covers both EVM chains and Solana, positioning itself as... Quantstamp Quantstamp is a leading blockchain security firm providing smart contract audits, security assessments, and formal verification for Solana programs and dApps. Having audited over 750 projects securing...
Both Kerberus and Quantstamp hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Kerberus uses a free model, while Quantstamp is paid. Kerberus has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Quantstamp's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Kerberus offers 5 features including Sentinel3 browser extension with 99.9% scam detection, Pre-signing warnings for malicious transactions, Risky contract approval and phishing-site detection, and 2 more. Quantstamp counters with 6 features including Solana smart contract security audits, Rust and Anchor program analysis, Formal verification services, and 3 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Kerberus currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Quantstamp is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Kerberus's key strengths include proactive pre-signing protection stops drains before they happen, reports 250k+ users and zero losses over 3+ years, covers both solana and evm chains. Quantstamp stands out for industry-leading security reputation, deep expertise in solana and rust programs, extensive track record with major protocols. On the flip side, Kerberus's weaknesses include no detection system is a 100% guarantee against novel attacks, while Quantstamp's main drawback is premium pricing for audit services.
More comparisons
Compare Kerberus with…
Compare Quantstamp with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 17,038 | 79,040 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Web3 wallet protection with 99.9% scam detection via browser extension | Blockchain security audits for Solana programs and dApps |
Both Kerberus and Quantstamp operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Kerberus is free to start and check Quantstamp's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.