Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 30, 2026
![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Kerberus Kerberus is a Web3 security tool that protects wallets from scams, delivering 99.9% scam detection through its Sentinel3 browser extension. It covers both EVM chains and Solana, positioning itself as... Reclaim Protocol Reclaim Protocol uses zkTLS infrastructure to let users prove facts about their Web2 data on-chain without exposing the underlying private information. It bridges the gap between the data people alrea...
Both Kerberus and Reclaim Protocol hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Kerberus uses a free model, while Reclaim Protocol is freemium. Kerberus has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Reclaim Protocol's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Kerberus offers 5 features including Sentinel3 browser extension with 99.9% scam detection, Pre-signing warnings for malicious transactions, Risky contract approval and phishing-site detection, and 2 more. Reclaim Protocol counters with 5 features including zkTLS infrastructure for proving Web2 data on-chain, Zero-knowledge proofs that verify claims without exposing private data, Support for 250+ websites including bank, social, and ride data, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Kerberus currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Reclaim Protocol is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Kerberus's key strengths include proactive pre-signing protection stops drains before they happen, reports 250k+ users and zero losses over 3+ years, covers both solana and evm chains. Reclaim Protocol stands out for lets users prove real-world data without revealing sensitive information, broad coverage across 250+ supported websites, backed by y combinator, polychain, and solana founders.
More comparisons
Compare Kerberus with…
Compare Reclaim Protocol with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | 17,038 | 8,446 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit, Developer Tools |
| Description | Web3 wallet protection with 99.9% scam detection via browser extension | Zero-knowledge proof identity verification for Solana dApps |
Both Kerberus and Reclaim Protocol operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Kerberus is free to start and Reclaim Protocol is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.