Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 30, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 7 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Kiln Kiln is the leading institutional staking platform operating 50,000+ validators and managing over $14 billion in staked assets across 50+ Proof-of-Stake networks. For Solana, Kiln represents approxima... SolanaHub SolanaHub is an all-in-one dashboard that consolidates a user's entire Solana footprint into a single interface. Instead of juggling separate sites for tracking holdings, staking, DeFi positions, and...
Both Kiln and SolanaHub hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Kiln uses a freemium model, while SolanaHub is free. SolanaHub has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Kiln's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Kiln offers 7 features including 50,000+ validators across 50+ PoS networks, $14B+ in managed staked assets, 2.5% of entire Solana network stake, and 4 more. SolanaHub counters with 5 features including Unified portfolio tracking across Solana holdings, Staking via the hubSOL liquid staking token, DeFi protocol integrations for managing positions in one place, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Kiln currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. SolanaHub is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Kiln's key strengths include enterprise-grade with soc 2 compliance, massive scale provides reliability, no minimum makes it accessible to everyone. SolanaHub stands out for consolidates portfolio, staking, defi, and nfts into one interface, hubsol lets users stake while retaining liquidity, live notifications from 15+ dapps give a unified activity view. On the flip side, Kiln's weaknesses include primarily targets institutional clients, while SolanaHub's main drawback is usefulness depends on its many dapp integrations staying current.
More comparisons
Compare Kiln with…
Compare SolanaHub with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 11,965 | — |
| Categories | Staking | Portfolio Trackers, Staking |
| Description | Enterprise-grade staking platform managing $14B+ across 50+ PoS networks including Solana | All-in-one Solana dashboard for portfolio tracking, staking, and DeFi |
Both Kiln and SolanaHub operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Kiln is free to start and SolanaHub is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.